Chalermchai Clarifies Ministerial Appointments Amidst Party Resolution Concerns

Bangkok: “Chalermchai” explains in detail, confirming adherence to regulations after submitting ministerial names that did not pass the party executive committee resolution, clearly stating that the 2024 coalition government resolution already gave the party leader power, denies consolidating power, there is a loophole to “except regulations” but did not do so.

According to Thai News Agency, Democrat Party leader Chalermchai Sri-on elucidated the party’s crucial decision-making process regarding coalition participation and the appointment of political positions after Deputy Leader Sutham Rahong submitted concerns to the Election Commission. The submission raised issues about the appointment of political office holders without passing a joint meeting resolution. Chalermchai emphasized that the decision made during the party executive committee and MPs’ meeting on August 29, 2024, to join the government still stands. Despite the evolving political situation, no vote was called to alter the coalition decision during the June 19 meeting, as the prime minister remained unchanged.

Chalermchai further clarified the party’s regulations, specifically Chapter 26, Article 134, which allows the executive board to bypass certain procedures with a three-fifths vote. However, he opted not to utilize this regulation. He stressed his commitment to transparency and inclusivity, stating, “I want everyone to express their opinions, I want everyone to hear their voices. I will not use this regulation.”

Regarding ministerial and party appointments, Chalermchai, with party secretary Decha-Isorn Khaothong, proceeded under the original resolution, informing MPs and submitting the list to the prime minister. He assured that these actions did not disrupt government operations.

Addressing objections from some party members, Chalermchai expressed confidence in the correctness of the process and discussed seeking an interpretation of the regulations from the party executive committee, which required only half of the votes. To foster unity, he called an additional meeting to reaffirm the legitimacy of past actions, underscoring the party’s adherence to its regulations.