Chonlanan Criticizes Anutin’s Short-Term Government as a Case Resolution, Not Parliamentary Dissolution

Bangkok: Chonlanan has criticized the Anutin government’s four-month term, describing it as a case resolution rather than a parliamentary dissolution. He expressed concerns that the government’s approach has extended its influence over MPs, senators, civil servants, and independent organizations, aiming to secure a future electoral advantage. He highlighted that, although the policies appear well-crafted, the individuals responsible for their implementation are problematic, contributing to national decline. He labeled the administration as the “Nune government” for not exercising its full power.

According to Thai News Agency, Dr. Cholanat Srikaew, a Pheu Thai Party MP for Nan, addressed the government’s policy statement to Parliament under Article 162 of the Constitution. Dr. Cholanat emphasized the importance the Pheu Thai Party places on Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul’s policy statement, tracking it from its initial announcement to its recent public declaration. He emphasized that this is a critical issue for the nation, especially during the current crisis. The Pheu Thai Party plans to maximize its allotted six hours of debate to address three primary concerns: the feasibility and appropriateness of the policies, the unsuitability of those managing the policies, and the potential loss of opportunities for the people.

Dr. Cholanat expressed confidence that the government’s promise to dissolve Parliament within four months would be fulfilled, as failure to do so could be damaging. He criticized the interim nature of Anutin’s administration, arguing against the tradition of minority governments and stressing the ineffectiveness of policies that can only be executed under an interim charter.

Additionally, Dr. Cholanat criticized the policies outlined in the MOA, emphasizing the lack of progress on constitutional amendments and the necessity of addressing defaults in the current framework. He urged the government to use its popularity to secure an electoral victory in 2026, allowing for continued governance.

Dr. Cholanat further critiqued the government’s strategy, particularly the appointment of outside ministers, which he viewed as a mechanism to consolidate power. He warned of four impending national disasters: a compromised electoral system, a lack of transparency and rule of law, ineffective national governance, and lost public opportunities. He criticized the government’s failure to implement policies addressing key issues like drug addiction and infrastructure, while acknowledging the continuation of the universal healthcare policy as a positive.

Dr. Cholanat concluded by urging political leaders to prioritize the nation’s interests, respect its core institutions, and promote transparency and integrity in governance. He expressed a desire for a government dedicated to serving the public with honesty and respect for democratic principles.

Archives