Bangkok: Chusak Sirinil, Minister to the Prime Minister’s Office and a core leader of the Pheu Thai Party, acknowledged that the party has approved the dissolution of Parliament, raising questions about whether the proposal has been submitted to His Majesty the King. He emphasized his authority to act as Prime Minister and highlighted concerns about the formation of a lame duck government if the current mechanism persists.
According to Thai News Agency, discussions held on September 2, 2015, with key leaders, including acting Prime Minister Mr. Phumtham Wechayachai and relevant stakeholders, led Mr. Chusak to believe that a thorough analysis will be conducted to select a prime minister, who will then dissolve Parliament. Following royal approval and a policy statement presentation to Parliament, the House of Representatives is expected to be dissolved within four months, with elections scheduled within 45-60 days. This process, Mr. Chusak argues, involves selecting a leader without administering the country, particularly during a crisis.
Mr. Chusak further explained that selecting a prime minister necessitates consideration of political party unity, which poses challenges. He questioned whether dissolving the Parliament altogether would be more effective, especially if the elected government turns out to be ineffective. Based on discussions, he believes that dissolving Parliament is appropriate, but the final decision rests with the Prime Minister.
Chusak also addressed two issues concerning the dissolution: the authority of the Council of State to propose a royal decree and the potential infringement on royal prerogative. While the Secretary-General of the Council of State claims no authority, others believe otherwise. He noted that the situation has changed from when Ms. Paethongtarn Shinawatra was Prime Minister, as Mr. Bhumtham now holds full authority.
Regarding royal prerogative, Mr. Chusak emphasized that the law requires a royal decree for Parliament dissolution, raising questions about who should propose it and respond to the royal command. Ultimately, it is the King’s decision, and Mr. Chusak has asked Mr. Bhumtham to consider the appropriate action. He believes this path is feasible.
Mr. Chusak reiterated that choosing a Prime Minister and dissolving Parliament after four months could harm the country. The election process must be dignified. He stated that whether Mr. Bhumtham has submitted the proposal for royal endorsement remains to be confirmed, as it is currently a discussion, not a party resolution.
When asked about Mr. Phumtham’s ability to proceed with the matter, Mr. Chusak affirmed that Mr. Phumtham has the responsibility to make the decision, having been entrusted by the party. If the House is dissolved and a petition is filed, the outcome must be awaited, and the House must consider any overlap with the process of selecting a prime minister.
Regarding the potential halt of the process by a petition to the Constitutional Court, Mr. Chusak noted that this is a future matter, and the caretaker government continues its duties.