Bangkok:"Ice" Rakchanok smiled and greeted "Suchada" in parliament before addressing heated social media comments about her challenge to sue a gambling website.
According to Thai News Agency, Rakchanok approached Suchada in the middle of the parliamentary meeting room, engaging with her for less than a minute. During this time, "Abhisit" glanced at them before "Ideer" posed a question about her concerns over being sued. Rakchanok, in response, insisted on telling the truth and challenged her to sue to settle the matter in court. The central question remains whether "Taiyang" operates a gambling website.
Reporters at the Parliament building provided details on the atmosphere of today's House of Representatives session, which included several key agenda items. These included proposed amendments to the House of Representatives rules of procedure by various political parties, concerning questions, amendments to bills, the use of information technology, and the consideration of individuals holding positions under the law. The session was generally orderly, but a brief commotion occurred in the chamber before the Prime Minister's arrival. Ms. Rakchanok Srinok, a party-list MP from the People's Party, approached Ms. Suchada Sangtansap, an MP from Chaiyaphum representing the Bhumjaithai Party, who was conversing with Ms. Wisuda Wichiansilp, an MP from Kanchanaburi also from the Bhumjaithai Party. Ms. Rakchanok, smiling, spoke with Ms. Suchada for about 30 seconds before departing the chamber. Meanwhile, Mr. Abhisit Vejjajiva, a party-list MP and leader of the Democrat Party, was seen passing by, glancing at the two women before taking his seat to join the meeting.
Subsequently, Ms. Suchada posted on her personal Facebook account, revealing a conversation and stating that in the parliamentary meeting today, Ms. Ice Rakchanok asked her if she would sue her. #Worried? Later, Ms. Rakchanok responded to comments under the post, saying, "The complete content of the conversation should be posted. I asked MP Suchada if she was going to sue, as she said she would. I want her to sue so that we can prove in court whether her husband actually owns the gambling website. This way, we can request documents and evidence for other purposes. To be precise, I'm not worried, but I'm challenging her. Last time, they claimed I talked about a necklace. I never said anything like that. It's all distortion.