Bangkok: The Deputy Minister of Interior has addressed concerns over the use of a single IP address by multiple applicants for local government positions, stressing that it is premature to assume corruption. The Deputy Minister highlighted that government network systems, particularly in provincial offices, utilize a shared internet system nationwide, necessitating a comprehensive investigation into all information. Should any irregularities emerge, appropriate action will be taken following established procedures.

According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Worasit Liengprasit, the Deputy Minister of Interior, discussed the issue of several applicants for local government positions registering with the same IP address, which has led to suspicions of corruption. He clarified the importance of distinguishing between "technical information" and "evidence of corruption." Mr. Worasit explained that the IP address in question could be a public address belonging to an agency or organization, used by multiple users-particularly in the context of provincial office internet networks. This means that multiple users can show the same IP address without being the same person, at the same location, or engaging in any wrongdoing.

Mr. Worasit emphasized that seeing the same IP address is not definitive evidence of fraud since technically, multiple users can access the internet through the same public IP address, especially on government networks. He noted that while checking IP addresses can serve as supplementary information in investigations, it should be considered alongside other details like registration date and time, location or network used, related devices, and other evidence that can clearly establish behavior.

The Deputy Minister stated that the Ministry of Interior is committed to a complete investigation and is not obstructing any inquiry. It is essential to differentiate between normal network usage and unusual behavior that is linked to corruption with evidence. Investigations should focus on facts rather than rushing to conclusions based on a single piece of data. If corruption is detected, those involved will face legal consequences. However, if it is merely shared internet use, fairness must be afforded to the applicants.

Mr. Worasit further expressed that the investigation's goal is to ensure fairness for all candidates. Thus, the process must rely on verifiable facts and evidence, not on judgments based solely on technical information. He concluded that while those who cheat must be prosecuted, innocent individuals must also receive justice, necessitating a thorough and impartial investigation using all available evidence.