Not accepting the decision on the Election Commission’s complaint, neglecting to move forward with the use of Section 112 policy for campaigning.

Constitutional Court The Constitutional Court does not accept the decision on the Election Commission's complaint that it has neglected to allow it to move forward with the policy to amend Section 112 to campaign for MP elections, which is considered to support the overthrow of the government. The Constitutional Court unanimously decided not to accept the request for consideration in the case in which Mr. Thoranit Mansri asked the Constitutional Court to rule in accordance with Section 49 of the Constitution, which states that the Election Commission Has a duty to supervise, control and enforce the law in accordance with Political Party Act 2017, Section 5, Section 28 and Section 29 and the Election Commission Regulations on campaigning methods and prohibited characteristics in campaigning for elections for members of the House of Representatives 2018, Section 17, but The Election Commission neglected to allow the Kao Kao Kai Party to bring up the issue of amending the Criminal Code, Section 112, to use in the election campaign. The ECT's actions were a neglect of duty as if it were supporting the Kao Kao Party Party to commit the crime of subverting the democratic regime of government. The King is the head of state. According to the Constitution, Section 49, paragraph one Source: Thai News Agency