Bangkok: The Progressive Social Security Team has submitted a petition to a parliamentary committee following their disqualification from the Social Security Board elections. The petition, addressed to the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Budget Monitoring, underscores the need for transparency and accountability in the election process.

According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Rangsiman Rome, Chairman of the Committee on Law, Justice and Human Rights, alongside Ms. Rakchanok Srinok, Chair of the Committee on Studying Budget Preparation and Monitoring, received a formal letter from Mr. Chalit Ratthapana. Mr. Chalit, representing the Progressive Social Security Team, raised concerns over his sudden removal from the candidate list by the Social Security Office (SSO).

Mr. Chalit, previously a member of the acting Social Security Board, was disqualified on July 1st by the SSO's Legal Division for allegedly lacking insured status. He contested this decision, citing evidence of his insured status under Section 33 until July 10th, as shown on the SSO Plus application and the office's website. He further criticized the Social Security system's inconsistencies that hindered his switch to Section 39 on July 1st, despite the system operating on a monthly contribution basis.

Mr. Chalit suggested that his disqualification might be politically motivated, linked to his disputes with the legal department and his opposition to changes in the election formula. He also referenced a court case where the Progressive Social Security Team successfully compelled the SSO to hold the election as scheduled. He expressed suspicion that the disqualification was a consequence of his investigations into corruption within the SSO, leading to several complaints filed with the National Anti-Corruption Commission.

Ms. Rakchanok highlighted the discretionary power of the SSO's legal department, suggesting it bordered on political harassment. She criticized the timing of Mr. Chalit's disqualification, arguing it deprived the public of the chance to elect their representatives. She speculated that this action might be a response to the SSO's dissatisfaction with being scrutinized, especially after their loss in the Administrative Court.

Mr. Rangsiman emphasized the national importance of the Social Security Fund, noting that it involves substantial sums and affects many citizens. He voiced concerns over the suspicious circumstances surrounding the election and warned against any abuse of power that could obstruct the investigation process. The committee pledged to closely monitor the situation and inform the media of any developments.

The committee urged media and public vigilance, emphasizing that this matter extends beyond individual rights to the transparency of the social security system. Ensuring genuine transparency and preventing mismanagement or corruption is crucial to avoiding potential national damage. The committee remains dedicated to supporting efforts that promote progress and accountability within the Social Security Office.