Bangkok, In the case of a wife who asked the Sai Mai Must Survive page to help her husband who was kidnapped over a 100 million inheritance, the older sister argued that the wife and son had hurt her younger brother, so she brought him to live with her. She said that the sister-in-law wanted to seize the assets. From the case of a wife who asked the Sai Mai Must Survive page to help Mr. Wisit, her sick husband, after his sister-in-law kidnapped him from his house in Charan 25 and detained him in the Samrong area of ??Samut Prakan, preventing him from seeing his family. Later, Ms. Savitree, aged 65, Wisit's sister, revealed that in May, she visited her younger brother at home and found that her younger brother was sick and his living conditions were not good. She could not accept this and felt sorry for her younger brother. That day, she also saw the food her younger brother ate and noticed that it was porridge that had been left out for a long time. Therefore, she believed that her younger brother was not getting enough nutrients. She saw that her younger brother complained that he wanted to eat many foods but did not eat them. Ms. Savitri also said that her younger brother was physically abused by his wife and children because she saw the wounds and knew that his younger brother was attacked by his wife, son and daughter until there were wounds that looked like nail marks on his back. As for the problem of fighting over the 100 million inheritance, she confirmed that it was caused by her younger brother's wife alone. She did not start it. It was her sister-in-law's idea to seize the property. The relatives never mentioned the property. She did it because she was concerned about her younger brother's health. Since she took her younger brother to live with her, she did not force him to sign any documents. Everything was her sister-in-law's idea. As for the entire inheritance, it has not been managed or divided to anyone yet because the certificate of appointment of the estate executor has just been obtained. All heirs, including the younger brother, are now joint estate executors. As for the issue where the sister-in-law went to file a complaint that she took her younger brother to confine him at home, Ms. Savitri pointed at her younger brother and asked back whether this was confinement or not because she could stay with him and eat food with complete nutrients even though she did not take her regular medicine because she took her younger brother to physical therapy and exercise as well. When asked if her younger brother had met his wife and son, Ms. Savitri said that she had just brought him here 10 days ago. On the day her sister-in-law went to the front of the house, she insisted that she did not close the door. As for her sister-in-law's claim that she pushed her younger brother's head when the police went to the house, Ms. Savitri said that she did not push him and that she could ask the police. She herself had been physically abused by her sister-in-law and her nephew, especially around the neck, in the h ope that she would be paralyzed. The mediator, Mr. Wisit, said that his sister told him that she would take him to live with her and take better care of him than his family. His family takes good care of him, but his sister takes better care of him. He insisted that neither side has physically harmed him, but he is not ready to go back yet. When reporters tried to ask him if he could contact his wife, Mr. Wisit refused and said that he was not ready to talk. Although he is not taking medication for his chronic illness, he is now in better health than before because his sister takes him to physical therapy and does yoga. Regarding the issue of inheritance, the news team tried to ask if this was the cause of the argument this time. Mr. Wisit admitted that the problem was caused by the inheritance of his eldest sister. He and his 4 siblings each have a share of the inheritance. Since he went to live at his sister's house, her sister brought some documents for him to sign, which he later found out were document s related to inheritance and he had already signed. When the reporter asked if Mr. Wisit wanted the inheritance, Mr. Wisit remained silent and did not answer the question. Source: Thai News Agency

Bangkok, In the case of a wife who asked the Sai Mai Must Survive page to help her husband who was kidnapped over a 100 million inheritance, the older sister argued that the wife and son had hurt her younger brother, so she brought him to live with her. She said that the sister-in-law wanted to seize the assets. From the case of a wife who asked the Sai Mai Must Survive page to help Mr. Wisit, her sick husband, after his sister-in-law kidnapped him from his house in Charan 25 and detained him in the Samrong area of ??Samut Prakan, preventing him from seeing his family. Later, Ms. Savitree, aged 65, Wisit's sister, revealed that in May, she visited her younger brother at home and found that her younger brother was sick and his living conditions were not good. She could not accept this and felt sorry for her younger brother. That day, she also saw the food her younger brother ate and noticed that it was porridge that had been left out for a long time. Therefore, she believed that her younger brother was not getting enough nutrients. She saw that her younger brother complained that he wanted to eat many foods but did not eat them. Ms. Savitri also said that her younger brother was physically abused by his wife and children because she saw the wounds and knew that his younger brother was attacked by his wife, son and daughter until there were wounds that looked like nail marks on his back. As for the problem of fighting over the 100 million inheritance, she confirmed that it was caused by her younger brother's wife alone. She did not start it. It was her sister-in-law's idea to seize the property. The relatives never mentioned the property. She did it because she was concerned about her younger brother's health. Since she took her younger brother to live with her, she did not force him to sign any documents. Everything was her sister-in-law's idea. As for the entire inheritance, it has not been managed or divided to anyone yet because the certificate of appointment of the estate executor has just been obtained. All heirs, including the younger brother, are now joint estate executors. As for the issue where the sister-in-law went to file a complaint that she took her younger brother to confine him at home, Ms. Savitri pointed at her younger brother and asked back whether this was confinement or not because she could stay with him and eat food with complete nutrients even though she did not take her regular medicine because she took her younger brother to physical therapy and exercise as well. When asked if her younger brother had met his wife and son, Ms. Savitri said that she had just brought him here 10 days ago. On the day her sister-in-law went to the front of the house, she insisted that she did not close the door. As for her sister-in-law's claim that she pushed her younger brother's head when the police went to the house, Ms. Savitri said that she did not push him and that she could ask the police. She herself had been physically abused by her sister-in-law and her nephew, especially around the neck, in the h ope that she would be paralyzed. The mediator, Mr. Wisit, said that his sister told him that she would take him to live with her and take better care of him than his family. His family takes good care of him, but his sister takes better care of him. He insisted that neither side has physically harmed him, but he is not ready to go back yet. When reporters tried to ask him if he could contact his wife, Mr. Wisit refused and said that he was not ready to talk. Although he is not taking medication for his chronic illness, he is now in better health than before because his sister takes him to physical therapy and does yoga. Regarding the issue of inheritance, the news team tried to ask if this was the cause of the argument this time. Mr. Wisit admitted that the problem was caused by the inheritance of his eldest sister. He and his 4 siblings each have a share of the inheritance. Since he went to live at his sister's house, her sister brought some documents for him to sign, which he later found out were document s related to inheritance and he had already signed. When the reporter asked if Mr. Wisit wanted the inheritance, Mr. Wisit remained silent and did not answer the question. Source: Thai News Agency