Srisuwan Demands Probe into Alleged Bribery Involving NACC Commissioner

Bangkok: Mr. Srisuwan Janya, leader of the Patriotic Organization, has filed a complaint with the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), urging an investigation into serious ethical misconduct by one of its commissioners. The commissioner is accused of accepting a bribe consisting of 246 baht worth of gold from a former deputy police chief to influence a legal case.

According to Thai News Agency, the complaint highlights potential violations of ethical standards as outlined in Section 235 (1) of the 2017 Constitution and Section 87 of the 2018 Act on Prevention and Suppression of Corruption. The allegations stem from an investigation by the Central Investigation Bureau, which submitted evidence to the NACC on January 5, 2026. The investigation implicated a group of government officials, including the NACC commissioner, in bribery to sway legal proceedings.

On January 6, 2026, the Royal Thai Police released audio recordings and video footage that captured the exchange involving the 246 baht weight of gold. These recordings documented key moments during the transaction, including the counting and verification of the gold bars, providing substantial evidence against the accused NACC member.

Officials from the NACC have responded with a statement emphasizing that the role of an NACC commissioner is not a political position and should not be judged by political standards. They stressed that commissioners must adhere to higher ethical standards, remain free from suspicion, and prioritize organizational integrity over personal interests. The statement highlighted concerns that retaining the commissioner amidst these allegations could compromise the independence of the investigative process and erode public trust.

In light of these developments, the Patriotic Organization has formally requested the NACC Chairman to investigate whether the commissioner's conduct breaches ethical standards outlined in multiple clauses. If violations are confirmed, the case should be forwarded to the Supreme Court for adjudication and penalties in line with actions taken against other politicians found guilty of ethical breaches.