Bangkok: “Wan Nor” has approved the opposition’s use of the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) in the motion, allowing the audience to interpret it themselves. He indicated that as long as no specific name is mentioned, the debate can proceed. If there are any regulatory violations, amendments will be required, and the debate may be postponed until April 10.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor Matha, President of the House of Representatives, commented on the no-confidence debate, stating that the opposition has agreed to change the motion’s name, which should resolve any issues. They are awaiting the revised document, expected on Monday, March 17. Once reviewed, orders will be issued to include it in the agenda, and on March 18, it will be sent to the Prime Minister for acknowledgment of the debate date. The no-confidence debate is slated to commence on March 24, contingent upon agreement among the three whips on the duration and scheduling. Further discussions are expected on March 19 to finalize the arrangement, as all parties desire public engagement in this first no-confidence debate under the current opposition leader and government. Ultimately, the public will determine the outcome, regardless of the vote.
When queried about the potential change of the name Thaksin Shinawatra to another term, the Speaker of the House mentioned that the opposition has yet to specify the alternative term. However, it remains broad and complies with regulations without naming any individuals. Should further amendments still breach regulations, additional revisions will be necessary. The debate’s opening on March 24 should proceed without concern, as the session can be extended to April 10, the session’s final day. Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor anticipates an orderly and regulation-compliant debate for public consumption.
Regarding the possibility of substituting a specific name with “that person” or the NLA, Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor assured that it should not pose issues, as no specific names are mentioned. Interpretation is left to the audience and parliament members.
In response to Mr. Nattapong Ruangpanyawut, the opposition leader, who stated that if the motion were amended, he would not halt the debate, Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor emphasized that while amending the motion is essential, adherence to debate rules is paramount. The Secretary-General of the House of Representatives will clarify these rules before the session begins to prevent procedural disputes.
‘Debating is akin to sports, governed by rules. Respect for these rules ensures smooth proceedings. While winning or losing is one aspect, the referee’s impartiality is crucial. Criticism is inevitable, but acceptance that not all parties can be pleased is necessary,’ remarked Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor.
Addressing potential protests due to name omissions or allusions, Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor stated that debates could proceed without explicit name mentions if no actual errors exist. This applies not only to Mr. Thaksin but to others as well, provided rules are not violated. Should name mentions be deemed necessary, constitutional constraints must be reassessed, as members involved in no-confidence motions for the prime minister and cabinet cannot represent themselves in explanations, unlike other motions.
In response to Democrat MP Mr. Chuan Leekpai’s warning about potential repercussions if Mr. Thaksin is excluded, Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor maintained that compliance with rules is the priority.