Bangkok: "Aitim Parit" has taken a decisive step by filing a police report following allegations from the Election Commission. He expressed his eagerness to collaborate fully with authorities, underlining his commitment to uphold electoral transparency as a responsible citizen.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Parit Wacharasindhu, spokesperson for the People's Party, accompanied by his legal counsel, engaged with investigators at the Crime Suppression Division. This meeting was prompted by the Election Commission's charges against him for alleged breaches of the Organic Act on the Election Commission 2017, Section 66, paragraph two; the Criminal Code, Sections 116, 209, and 322; and the Computer Crime Act, Section 14.
Mr. Parit explained that he came forward after learning from news reports that the Election Commission had filed charges against six individuals, including himself, who were observers during the re-election in Khan Na Yao district on February 22nd. His police report serves to affirm his innocence. Mr. Parit refrained from naming others involved, emphasizing that it is the accusers who are privy to the charges. He appealed to the Election Commission for clarity on the accusations, rather than relying on leaked information.
Addressing the charge of criminal conspiracy, Mr. Parit recounted his presence at the polling station post-closure on February 22nd, during the vote count-a process mandated to be transparent by the Election Commission. He asserted that his presence was legal, with numerous EC officials, including the Deputy Secretary-General, present and not objecting to his actions. Mr. Parit reiterated his adherence to the law and readiness to face judicial proceedings to affirm his innocence.
When queried about a potential counter-suit, Mr. Parit stated that filing a counter-suit based on knowingly false information is illegal. He indicated that if the Election Commission's complaint is found to be factually inaccurate, Dr. Wayo Asavarungruang, deputy leader of the People's Party, is prepared to act.
On the severity of the conspiracy charges, Mr. Parit maintained his innocence and challenged accusers to present evidence publicly. He emphasized his duty as a Member of Parliament to scrutinize government operations, including electoral transparency, and expressed his willingness to investigate any irregularities involving the Election Commission.
Responding to whether the charges were a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation), Mr. Parit could not confirm such intentions for others. He noted discrepancies in the presence of accused individuals at the scene and called for them to clarify the facts. As a politician, he is committed to proving his innocence and fulfilling his representative duties in monitoring the Election Commission's actions.
Mr. Parit highlighted the societal implications of SLAPP lawsuits in Thailand, stressing that even if proven innocent, the accused face significant burdens. He emphasized the importance of government agencies addressing citizens' inquiries transparently rather than resorting to legal action, which can stifle freedom of expression-a cornerstone of democracy.