Bangkok: Anutin Charnvirakul, leader of the Bhumjaithai Party, confidently refuted any speculation about a tight electoral race, asserting that his party's polls consistently show them in the lead. He addressed concerns about opposition dominance in major cities, promoting an "organic" campaign strategy focused on grassroots engagement.

According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Anutin emphasized that his recent rally in Bangkok was a standard event, part of a broader strategy to establish a presence across various provinces. The Bhumjaithai Party plans to extend their campaign beyond Bangkok, engaging directly with voters to understand and address their concerns.

Mr. Anutin downplayed suggestions of a fierce competition with the People's Party, stating that the Bhumjaithai Party's candidates are committed and industrious. He denied allegations that his speech on Article 112 amendments was an attack on other parties, clarifying that cooperation among parties should not pose a problem as each must communicate transparently with the public.

Addressing the Khao Kradong issue, Mr. Anutin firmly denied any interference or acquaintance with the State Railway of Thailand's governor, emphasizing that legal actions are proceeding as per due process. He reiterated his commitment to legal integrity, indicating no leniency for wrongdoing, regardless of personal or party affiliations.

Mr. Anutin also responded to remarks by Mr. Nattawut Saikua of the Pheu Thai Party regarding "nation robbery," dismissing them as rhetorical provocations. He criticized such statements for inciting unrest without accountability. On potential discrediting of his economic team, Mr. Anutin expressed confidence in their integrity and contributions to society.

Regarding political negotiations, Mr. Anutin recounted discussions with Captain Thamanat Phromphao, clarifying that ministerial appointments were made based on situational suitability and mutual agreement. He described the negotiation process as standard practice in politics.

Mr. Anutin humorously deflected questions about his future ministerial ambitions, suggesting that the outcome of the upcoming election would determine his role. He reiterated his confidence in leading the polls and encouraged further inquiries to other political parties for alternative perspectives.