Bangkok: Charan Pakdeethanakul, a former Constitutional Court judge, delivered a speech at an academic seminar organized by the Senate Academic Committee and the King Prajadhipok’s Institute, focusing on constitutional amendments. He praised the “20 to 1 Drafting Committee” formula, which allows for open participation without violating existing rulings. Charan cautioned against amending Sections 1 and 2 of the constitution, emphasizing the need for balanced scrutiny and a “triple-win solution” for the country.

According to Thai News Agency, Charan discussed the importance of aligning constitutional amendments with diverse interests and political beliefs, stressing the need to listen to the majority while not neglecting the minority. He highlighted that amendments should benefit both the people and the country, warning that failure to achieve balance could lead to national division and vulnerability to external influences, similar to conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.

Charan praised the Constitution Drafting Committee (CDC), which comprises 20 members of parliament who select one member to serve as a drafter. This approach, he noted, avoids conflict with the Constitutional Court’s ruling and minimizes risks of incitement. He expressed confidence in the participatory nature of the process, where political parties and senators proportionally select members to contribute to the drafting, ensuring diverse input and reducing potential conflicts.

He also warned against constitutional changes that might undermine Chapters 1 and 2, particularly those affecting the form of the state and royal power, as these could incite protests. Charan emphasized the importance of maintaining Section 255 of the Constitution to prevent potential unrest and ensure stability.

Charan addressed concerns about the oversight system under the 2017 Constitution, which he believes gives the appearance of governmental dominance. He advocated for a new constitution that effectively prevents corruption while maintaining balance and inclusivity. He called for non-aggressive, constructive public participation in the constitutional process, underscoring the people’s role as the true sovereign power.