Bangkok: Ms. Bunyanuch, known as the admin of the ‘Oysri and Phong Pueak’ page, visited Division 3 of the Crime Suppression Division to provide her statement regarding the ongoing ‘Lawyer Tum’ case. She expressed her belief that ‘Madam Oi’ did not provide financial support out of affection.
According to Thai News Agency, Oil Sri was invited by police officers to give a statement concerning the Lawyer Tum case, although she was unsure of the specific matters to be addressed. She speculated that the police might seek introductions to individuals with knowledge of Lawyer Tum, potentially to serve as witnesses. Oil Sri clarified that her criticisms of Lawyer Tum were based on factual observations and not influenced by personal bias, although she acknowledged receiving communications from individuals possibly intending to file complaints against him.
Oil Sri questioned the legitimacy of the alleged 71 million baht given to Lawyer Tum, suggesting that true gifts are given without terms or conditions. She referenc
ed a media interview in which Lawyer Tum questioned why a lawsuit for fraud was filed against him despite the existence of a quotation, implying an agreement was in place. This led her to conclude that the money was not given out of affection.
Additionally, Oisri expressed surprise at the extent of Lawyer Tum’s involvement in financial matters, noting that lawyers typically focus on litigation, document preparation, and court appearances.