The Criminal Court for Corruption Cases ordered “Sia Heng” to answer the charges to cover all issues. Case filed against DSI Director-General and those

Bangkok, The Criminal Court for Corruption Cases orders "Sia Heng" to plead the case to all points, pointing out the circumstances. A case was filed against the Director-General of the DSI against those who acted improperly. Pretend to get punished The case allegedly broke the queue of workers going to Finland. Send a letter to the Department of Special Investigation explaining the matter of being sued. Listen to the order of the prosecution examination again on 9 Apr. On February 6 at the Central Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases Road along the railway track, Taling Chan, the court scheduled to hear the order of the investigation into the lawsuit in the case of black number A.T.11/2567, filed by Mr. Suchat Chomklin, former Minister of Labor. along with a group of 14 MPs from the Ruam Thai Sang Chart Party Traveled to file a lawsuit Former Director-General of the DSI Acting Director-General of the DSI and Director of DSI's Human Trafficking Division In the offense of misconduct in performin g duties etc. According to Section 157 of the Criminal Code and other related charges In the case that the Department of Special Investigation or DSI announced on January 10th, The decision was made to accuse two former ministers and two senior executives of the Ministry of Labor, totaling four people, of offenses under Sections 149 and 157 after evidence was found connecting them. Related to the deduction fee Laborers who go to collect wild fruits at Finland, 12,000 people between 2020-2023, 3,000 baht each, total damages 36 million baht. At the press conference at that time, on January 12, Mr. Suchat came out to counter the DSI to bring financial evidence to clarify and that came to be charged but was never called for questioning and press release of DSI at that time caused Mr. Suchart to suffer damage. Appointment to hear the order or judgment today: the plaintiff, the plaintiff's lawyer, and the 3rd defendant's attorney come to court. Considering the plaintiff's complaint, it is seen that The plaintiff described the lawsuit alleging that the three defendants committed crimes and requested that all three defendants be punished according to Section 157, Section 173, Section 174, paragraph 2, and Section 200, paragraph 2, but the plaintiff did not fully describe the lawsuit. Section 158 of the Criminal Procedure Code in conjunction with the Corruption and Misconduct Case Procedure Act 2016, Section 15, paragraph one, and clearly stating that the three defendants committed crimes under the circumstances alleging that How do you commit an offense? Nor did he explain the evidence clearly enough to proceed with the proceedings. Therefore, let the plaintiff amend the complaint correctly and completely in accordance with the following actions: 1. The plaintiff describes the complaint as follows: That the defendant 2As Director of the Human Trafficking Division, Department of Special Investigation Make a report and present it to the defendant. 1As Director-General of the Department of Special Investigation In order to accuse the plaintiff and her associates with the Anti-Corruption Commission or NACC, then the first defendant sent a secret letter from the Department of Special Investigation dated 31 Oct. 2023 to the NACC. G. accused the plaintiff and her associates of working together or supporting Ms. Kanlayakorn or Durian Phongphit to collect money from Reban Company Limited and from other coordinating agent companies as well. The plaintiff is to explain. Make it clear that Such action by the defendant is a violation of any law, rule, notification, regulation, regulation, ordinance or order in any section or clause of the provision. or any guidelines, except in such cases, the plaintiff describes the lawsuit only to show that the 2nd defendant was involved in the false press release of the 2nd and 3rd defendants that the plaintiff described in the lawsuit. Let the plaintiff explain clearly. 2. Have the plaintiff explain the lawsuit clearly. The message given by the three defendants Which statement is false? Which sta tement is true or what is the truth? How did the three defendants know that there was no evidence against the plaintiff? And how did the plaintiff know that the three defendants already knew that the plaintiff had not committed a crime? As well as clearly indicating whether there is any evidence that supports or demonstrates such actions and behavior of the defendant and that it is sufficient to proceed with the proceedings. Incidentally, when the plaintiff describes the lawsuit alleging that the defendant committed an offense against the law by violating the provisions of the law. Ask the court to punish the defendant which shows that the plaintiff must be aware of the existence or non-existence of the act constituting the offense charged against the plaintiff. As well as the provisions of any such announcements, rules, regulations, requirements or orders, it is considered appropriate for the plaintiff to submit relevant documents that support the facts as claimed in the description of the complaint against the plaintiff. and the content of the news in the document attached to the lawsuit that the plaintiff submitted was incomplete. Including other evidence (if any) submitted to the court in its entirety along with the amended complaint. If the plaintiff does not amend the complaint or amend the complaint within the specified period. The court will consider the facts as described in the complaint or amended complaint. Various evidence that has been pointed out These are all facts and evidence related to the defendant's actions that the plaintiff wishes to present at the preliminary hearing. The plaintiff shall amend the complaint by making a request to amend the complaint, specifying additional information on the issues in accordance with the order submitted to the court within 30 days from today. If there is evidence or documents related to the matter, the plaintiff must submit them in their entirety. If the plaintiff fails to proceed with the court order in any of the cases mentioned above. It shall be conside red that the proceedings are not proceeding within the period specified by the court. The court may order not to accept the lawsuit. A letter must be sent to the Department of Special Investigation. A copy of the complaint in this case is attached along with the inquiry letter. In order for the Department of Special Investigation to clarify the facts and provide information. As it appears in the indictment, during the announcement of the Department of Special Investigation's press conference and while there was a press conference to the media regarding the case as per the lawsuit. What stage is this process in? When will the investigation of the Department of Special Investigation be completed? For further consideration, the Department of Special Investigation will clarify and submit relevant information and documents to the Criminal Court. Central corruption and misconduct cases within March 11, 2024, have the plaintiff examine the file to check the clarification letter from the Department of Special Invest igation. If the plaintiff wishes to dispute or object to the said facts or information, he or she must submit a statement to the court by March 26, 2024. Postpone the appointment to hear the order or judgment and set the date for the preliminary hearing on April 9. Time 09.30 a.m. Source: Thai News Agency