Bangkok: Bovornsak affirmed that the government has formulated the referendum questions within the framework of the Constitutional Court's ruling. He emphasized that the focus shouldn't be solely on Chapters 1 and 2, as the King's powers are encompassed across multiple chapters, and any amendments should be fully disclosed to avoid perceptions of attempting to overthrow the government.

According to Thai News Agency, Deputy Prime Minister Bowornsak Uwanno addressed concerns about the referendum questions not specifically excluding Chapters 1 and 2, which could potentially cause future issues. He argued that those insisting on excluding these chapters have not thoroughly reviewed the Constitutional Court's ruling, which forms the basis of the government's proposals. Bowornsak explained that the democratic system with a constitutional monarchy involves numerous chapters, including those regarding the Cabinet that involve royal prerogatives like enacting royal decrees and approving treaties.

Bowornsak further noted the necessity of examining prohibitions against amending the constitution and altering the system of governance under a constitutional monarchy. He highlighted that a constitution passed by referendum becomes invalid if not signed by the King or if vetoed, a practice established since 1948. This was clearly stated in the constitutions of 1949, 1997, 2006, and 2014.

He cautioned that allowing parliamentary confirmation of a vetoed constitution would represent a change to the democratic system with the King as head of state, which contradicts traditional governance practices. Thus, focusing solely on Chapters 1 and 2 is insufficient.

Bowornsak clarified that while Chapter 1 contains general provisions with one article on the monarchy, Chapter 2 addresses the monarch's personal powers, like appointing Privy Councilors. However, the monarch's governing powers are detailed in the Cabinet chapter. The power to dissolve Parliament, for instance, resides in the Parliament chapter, as it requires a royal decree from the King.

Bowornsak emphasized the importance of recording interviews and clearly stating all aspects, including what amendments will not occur, underscoring that the discussion extends beyond Chapters 1 and 2 to multiple categories.