Bangkok: The initial day of the no-confidence debate saw a deep dive into the opposition’s information and a series of responses from the Prime Minister to pointed questions. The day’s proceedings have sparked discussions about the potential political ramifications. According to Thai News Agency, Asst. Prof. Dr. Wanwichit Boonprong, a lecturer at the Faculty of Political Science, Rangsit University, provided

Bangkok: “Sutin” mocks the opposition, saying the first half of the censure debate was light, not to the point of sprinkling salt. According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Sutin Khlangsaeng, MP for the Pheu Thai Party, expressed his views on the recent no-confidence debate in the House of Representatives. He criticized the opposition, led by General Prawit Wongsuwan of the

Bangkok: In a heated session of the House of Representatives, Mr. Woraphop Wiriyaroj, a party-list MP from the Prachachon Party, demanded answers from the Prime Minister regarding the escalating electricity prices. Woraphop accused the government of engaging in policy corruption and implementing an opaque process in a 3,600-megawatt renewable electricity purchase, which he claims benefits energy capital groups linked to

Bangkok: “Nattapong” has initiated a no-confidence debate, highlighting concerns about a “deal for exchanging the country” which, he argues, not only focuses on bringing “Thaksin” back home but also on regressing the nation in various ways. He stated there are no longer two or three separate kingdoms, but only one remaining entity, which is the coup-making party that has unified.

Bangkok: “Anutin” stands up to explain on behalf of the Prime Minister, confirming that there is no deal of benefits in the Alpine-Khao Kradong land problem, pointing out that it is a shortcoming of the Land Department. The Prime Minister and his family are the victims and can claim for damages. Before saying “Fight, Paethongtarn” According to Thai News Agency,

Bangkok: “Chaichana” believes that the Democrat Party will not split in support of Prime Minister Paethongtarn. Chaichana criticizes the opposition for its approach, alleging that the government has “Thaksin” while the opposition holds “Thanathorn” as a spiritual leader. He expresses confidence that the Democrat Party will remain united in its support for “PM Paethongtarn” but notes that a final decision

Bangkok: The Minister of Foreign Affairs has countered accusations from the opposition party regarding the alleged lack of collaboration with neighboring countries to address the PM2.5 dust issue. The Minister highlighted ongoing cooperation with Thailand, Laos, and Myanmar, emphasizing the launch of the Clear Sky Strategy since October of the previous year, with plans to continue leveraging international forums for

Bangkok: During a no-confidence debate in Thailand’s House of Representatives, Ms. Pimporn Pornphruethiphan, a Member of Parliament from Phetchabun representing the Palang Pracharath Party (PPRP), raised serious concerns about Prime Minister Paethongtarn’s financial dealings. She accused the Prime Minister of potentially transferring assets to relatives in a manner that might circumvent tax obligations, a duty expected of all Thai citizens.