Bangkok: In a recent development regarding the Senate collusion case, Chanin, the Deputy Secretary-General of the Election Commission (EC), admitted to being unable to recall his opinion on the matter. This revelation came amid ongoing discussions and investigations into the case, which has garnered significant public interest and scrutiny.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Saeng Boonmee, Secretary-General of the Election Commission, addressed media queries at a public relations event, shedding light on the current status of the Senate collusion case. He assured that the EC office has adhered to all necessary legal procedures and regulations. The 36th Sub-Committee for Investigation, Inquiry, and Adjudication is believed to have already submitted its findings to the EC office, which is now preparing the documentation for further consideration by the Election Commission.
In response to questions about the involvement of those not privy to the case details, Mr. Saeng confirmed that neither he nor the Election Commission had been informed about the decision of the subcommittee. He mentioned that the EC had received a letter from a stakeholder asking for updates on the case, and while they have expedited the process as much as possible, further details remain undisclosed.
When questioned about the potential political impact of dismissing the complaint at the subcommittee level, especially with some perceiving new EC members as aligned with the "blue" Senate, Mr. Saeng stated, "That's beyond the EC's authority." He emphasized that the Commission's decisions are based on legal correctness and evidence, acknowledging the competitive pressures within the political environment.
Addressing concerns about the EC's independence, Mr. Saeng acknowledged societal perceptions of a possible "blue network" influence but reiterated that the Commission's focus remains on performing its duties with integrity. He stated that public opinions would be scrutinized, but facts must ultimately determine the validity of accusations.
The 36th Sub-Committee's ruling contradicted the previous stance of Pol. Lt. Col. Chanin Noi Lek, fueling speculation that the EC might be used to obscure certain aspects of the case. Chanin, however, claimed he was unaware of the subcommittee's opinion and could not recall his prior comments.
Mr. Saeng further explained that due to the confidential nature of the investigation, neither the 26th Investigation Committee nor the 36th Sub-Committee can disclose their opinions. The final stage of the Election Commission's consideration, which includes a comprehensive review of facts, legal arguments, and resolutions, remains pending. It is anticipated that the process will require significant time due to the volume of documentation involved.
Regarding the legality of the 36th Sub-Committee's appointment, Mr. Saeng reiterated that only the investigation committee members are privy to such details. The EC has ensured compliance with all relevant laws and regulations before making appointments, leaving the ultimate judgment to the committee's findings.