Bangkok: "Bovornsak" is preparing to file a lawsuit against Italian-Thai Development Public Company Limited for damages, emphasizing that the government is not remaining inactive. Deputy Prime Minister Bowornsak Uwanno revealed the government's approach to compensating the families of those who lost loved ones in the construction crane collapse at the high-speed rail project. He stated that the government is expediting compensation payments to the families of the deceased, including five foreign nationals. Furthermore, the government will discuss with the Attorney General's office the possibility of pursuing legal action to claim damages. Those affected can join the Attorney General's office as plaintiffs, and the government is ready to provide full support.

According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Bowornsak stated that this incident was not a one-time occurrence but had happened repeatedly, affecting public safety. This is a crucial aspect of administrative contracts, which differ from general civil contracts. Therefore, the consideration of such matters must prioritize the interests and safety of the public. He affirmed that the government will not ignore the incident.

When asked whether terminating the contract with Italian-Thai Development Public Company Limited would constitute a "compensation for folly," Mr. Bowornsak stated that the Attorney General must consider the legal aspects of administrative contracts, as it cannot be based solely on civil law. He emphasized that the Administrative Court prioritizes public safety and stressed the need to find a way to terminate the contract and sue for damages, as the case is not yet considered closed.

Furthermore, the government must proceed with amending related ministerial regulations and seek cooperation from the Engineering Council to strictly oversee structural engineers. As for the timeframe for contract termination, that must await consideration from the Attorney General.

Regarding the possibility of a countersuit from the private company, Mr. Bowornsak stated that it is their right to do so, but the state is prepared to fight back with evidence, highlighting the repeated shortcomings and gross negligence that occurred, not just the first time.