Bangkok: Mr. Phantil Nuamjerm, a Bangkok MP from the People's Party, addressed concerns about budget allocations for meals of Members of Parliament (MPs) and their assistants, as well as the pension fund for former MPs. During a press conference, he emphasized the need for more appropriate meal provisions for MPs to reduce waste, suggesting spending limits as a solution. Additionally, he advocated for performance indicators for MP assistants to prevent misuse of resources.

According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Phantil highlighted the longstanding debate over the cost of meals for MPs and Senators, which is funded by taxpayers. He referenced Mr. Sophon Saram, the newly appointed Speaker of the House of Representatives, who acknowledged the issue of free meals for MPs with high salaries. Mr. Phantil questioned whether such benefits are reasonable, especially considering the disparity between MP salaries and the average cost of living in Thailand.

Mr. Phantil noted that while MPs earn significantly more than the average Thai salary, the path to becoming an MP involves substantial financial investment and risk, often deterring ordinary citizens from participating in politics. He raised concerns about the high cost of election campaigns and the financial burden on MPs, suggesting that the system might discourage broader political participation.

Addressing the issue of food provisions, Mr. Phantil argued for a balanced approach that considers taxpayer funds. He proposed a prepaid card system to manage daily spending on meals, as opposed to the current buffet-style offerings. This system would aim to be more efficient and economical, ensuring MPs' needs are met without unnecessary extravagance.

Regarding MP assistants, Mr. Phantil expressed concerns about the increase in salaries and the lack of performance indicators. He noted that in other countries, clear missions and performance metrics are in place for parliamentary assistants. He called for similar measures in Thailand to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure transparency, particularly amid accusations of nepotism.

Mr. Phantil also addressed the pension fund for MPs, pointing out its current financial unsustainability. The fund's contribution structure, reliant on taxpayer subsidies and minimal returns, has led to concerns about its long-term viability. He suggested recalibrating the fund's formula to ensure a more equitable and sustainable financial model, advocating for increased government support and member contributions to secure future benefits.