Bangkok: Mr. Plodprasob Suraswadi, Chairman of the Special Committee to Study the Improvement of Construction Standards, Safety Standards, Remedies for Affected Persons, and the Development of the Potential of the Construction Contractor Industry in a Systemic Way, has called on the Auditor General to personally address the committee regarding the collapse of the new Auditor General’s building. The incident nearly resulted in the committee sending back the representative, but patience was exercised due to the seniority of those involved.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Plodprasob expressed an understanding of the difficult position faced by the Auditor General. Drawing parallels with his own experiences, he recalled the Salween forest case wherein he faced criticism and scrutiny. He noted the gravity of the building collapse incident, which resulted in over a hundred deaths and raised questions about budgetary and insurance implications. He emphasized the need for accountability and the consequences the Auditor General must endure.
Mr. Plodprasob further noted that many representatives of the State Audit Office present were not directly involved in the incident and hence did not bear responsibility. However, he emphasized the collective duty to prevent future occurrences. Highlighting the significant cost of over 2,000 million baht and the swift collapse of the structure, he urged the committee to support efforts that would introduce substantial reforms in construction standards and regulations.
He insisted that the incident indicates flaws in existing regulations, suggesting that if such an incident could occur despite following rules, then the regulations are flawed or there is something concealed. Mr. Plodprasob stressed that the committee’s aim is to revolutionize and reform government regulations to prevent similar incidents. He reassured the State Audit Office that the committee’s intent is not to assign blame but to understand the truth for future safety.
Mr. Plodprasob challenged the Auditor General to demonstrate greater responsibility and courage in addressing the situation, suggesting that doing so would help clear any societal accusations. He expressed a commitment to inviting the Auditor General back for further explanations, emphasizing that the committee respects the position of the Deputy Auditor General but seeks direct insight from the head.
In conclusion, Mr. Plodprasob outlined the need for a new question, the 21st, for the Auditor General to address: What advice would he offer if a similar incident occurred within another agency? He emphasized that the committee would work towards amending laws to enhance the efficiency and trustworthiness of the Auditor General’s office, ensuring accountability through thorough investigation.