Bangkok: Senator Nantana Nantvaropas has voiced strong opposition to the Senate’s decision to proceed with selecting positions in independent organizations, arguing that such actions are akin to choosing judges for their own cases and ignoring public interest.

According to Thai News Agency, Ms. Nantana emphasized that the Senate’s move to approve positions in organizations like the Election Commission (EC) and Constitutional Court judges is inappropriate due to ongoing allegations of collusion in the selection of senators. The 26th Investigation Committee, jointly established by the EC and DSI, has already forwarded these allegations to the EC, indicating their validity. Ms. Nantana questioned why the Senate plans to move forward with these approvals, scheduled for July 22, given that the EC and Constitutional Court have significant roles in overseeing legal proceedings related to these allegations.

Ms. Nantana highlighted the ethical dilemma faced by senators, who simultaneously act as petitioners and accused parties in matters involving the EC and Constitutional Court. She argued that voting on these positions should be postponed until the allegations are resolved to maintain integrity in the justice process.

Ms. Nantana warned that the public could perceive the Senate’s actions as self-serving, given that a significant number of senators are implicated in the allegations. She stressed that delaying the vote does not equate to dereliction of duty and is not a violation of Section 157, as confirmed by legal experts. Postponing the vote would uphold the Senate’s ethical standards and demonstrate a commitment to justice.

Despite facing opposition and accusations from some senators, Ms. Nantana remains steadfast in her advocacy for postponement. She plans to propose an oral motion to continue her objections, emphasizing her dedication to protecting public interest and ensuring a fair justice process in Thailand.

Ms. Nantana concluded by urging the Senate to delay the elections, stating that doing so would be in the country’s best interest and would be acknowledged by the public as an act of integrity. She reaffirmed her commitment to fighting for a just and transparent legal system, regardless of personal or political consequences.