Bangkok: "Teng" remains unfazed by the National Anti-Corruption Commission's (NACC) impending appeal to the Supreme Court concerning 44 MPs. He declared that those in power should refrain from such actions, emphasizing that initiating the case on the policy statement day only increases public dissatisfaction.

According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Nattapong Ruangpanyawut, a party-list MP and leader of the People's Party, commented on the NACC's preparation to submit the case against 44 former Move Forward Party MPs. These MPs were involved in amending Article 112 of the Criminal Code, with the case set to be submitted to the Supreme Court on April 9th. He noted that, typically, especially if the case coincides with the Songkran festival, the court should have accepted the petition or issued an order on whether the MPs should continue their duties after the holiday.

Mr. Nattapong stressed that those with the power to influence the process should refrain from doing so, as there is no justification to obstruct the People's Party's debate on policy statement day. He believes that the matter should be left to the parliamentary process to proceed effectively.

Addressing potential political implications, Mr. Nattapong highlighted that the case against the 44 MPs challenges the principle that MPs have the authority to amend laws. He described the situation as a legal war, with opposing political factions using legal means to obstruct and undermine the government. This approach, he warned, only breeds public dissatisfaction, as people seek justice and legitimacy for the government to push through its policies legitimately.

Mr. Nattapong acknowledged that the case involves independent organizations and is now before the Supreme Court. However, he expressed concerns that society is questioning whether the Bhumjaithai Party, as the leading party in the government, has undue influence over these organizations. He cautioned against rushing the process, as it might lead to public suspicion of government involvement.

Regarding potential rulings during the government policy statement debate, Mr. Nattapong expressed confidence that the Supreme Court would act fairly, recognizing the political motivations behind the case. He assured that the party is prepared for all scenarios, having anticipated the worst-case scenario, and is ready to proceed regardless of when the ruling is issued.