Bangkok: The Election Commission of Thailand (ECT) has yet to receive an official report regarding Mr. Chaturon Chaisang's involvement in a campaign supporting constitutional amendments.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Saeng Boonmee, Secretary-General of the ECT, addressed concerns raised about Mr. Chaturon, a candidate from the Pheu Thai Party, who allegedly produced a video featuring the Mon Thong Wittaya School football team endorsing constitutional changes.
Mr. Boonmee stated the need to examine the facts and relevant laws to determine whether Mr. Chaturon's actions could be considered deceptive or defamatory. He emphasized that it remains unclear if the behavior constitutes illegal activity, as further investigation is required.
Allegations have also emerged about young football players being potentially influenced to express support for constitutional amendments. Mr. Boonmee highlighted that freedom of expression is a legal right, but any coercion or manipulation needs to be thoroughly investigated. Currently, no formal complaints have been filed, and the situation is based on preliminary reports and conflicting accounts.
Mr. Srisuwan Janya, leader of the Patriotic Organization, plans to file a complaint with the Election Commission, questioning if Mr. Chaturon's actions breach the 2025 Referendum Act and the 2003 Child Protection Act. Mr. Saeng acknowledged Mr. Srisuwan's right to file a complaint, though it is uncertain whether the allegations constitute an offense. The ECT encourages anyone suspecting deception to come forward to prompt a formal investigation.
On the same day, Mr. Srisuwan lodged a complaint with the Election Commission, citing statements from Mr. Sakol Kliangprasert, coach of the Mon Thong Witthaya football team, who claimed ignorance of the video's creation. Mr. Sakol asserted that neither he nor his students are politically affiliated, suggesting that their newfound fame is being exploited. Mr. Srisuwan argues that Mr. Chaturon's dissemination of the video may be intended to sway voter opinions, which would contravene the Referendum Act.
Additionally, the participation of young, non-voting football players in the video raises concerns over potential violations of child protection laws. These laws prohibit exploiting children for personal or political gain. Despite Mr. Chaturon removing the video, Mr. Srisuwan contends that the alleged offense remains valid and has prompted the Election Commission to ensure lawful accountability.