Bangkok: The People's Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) is poised to propose a motion to establish a parliamentary committee aimed at investigating the use of a 400 billion baht loan. The PDRC hopes that Speaker Sophon will prioritize this motion on the legislative agenda.

According to Thai News Agency, Ms. Pakamon Nunanan, spokesperson for the People's Party, remarked on the party's intention to submit the motion tomorrow to form a special committee for reviewing the utilization of funds from the 400 billion baht loan decree. She emphasized that although preparations are finalized, it's yet to be determined if the Speaker of the House of Representatives will permit the motion. The decision lies in whether the Speaker will allow the House to delve into questions surrounding the loan decree. Despite the government's assertion that the loan does not breach the constitution and that every baht is safeguarded for public benefit, doubts persist. There is particular concern regarding the urgency and cost-effectiveness of the second tranche of funds designated for energy infrastructure compensation or transitions. The government is urged to show sincerity through enabling open scrutiny and discussion within the House, thereby illustrating to the public the borrowing process and its al ignment with national interests.

Ms. Pakamon further stated, "It depends on the government's sincerity in allowing the legislature to scrutinize its spending. These are funds that the public should be aware of - how the government will use them, the procedures, and ultimately, the government's sincerity towards the people. Is it just words, or are they demonstrated through actions?"

When queried about the immediate use of funds following the publication of the emergency borrowing decree in the Royal Gazette, and whether parliamentary proceedings were merely ceremonial, Ms. Pakamon explained that the Prime Minister ultimately holds the authority to utilize the funds and initiate necessary measures. However, she added that a sincere approach towards the opposition and public interest would eliminate the need to sidestep parliamentary questioning. Allowing such questioning today would provide a valuable opportunity for the government to communicate with the public, fostering understanding and trust in the Prime Minister's financial decisions.