Thai News Agency, Sept. 21 – “Cho Pannika” insists that she will not give up even though she has been deprived of her rights for life. Still moving forward with political missions outside parliament Because the goal is change. It is not about becoming an MP or Minister. He said that if a politician has no future It should be left to the people to decide. Not ethical standards, hoping to draft a new constitution

Ms. Pannika Wanich, former MP of the Future Forward Party, gave an interview to “Thai News Agency” about the case where the Supreme Court ruled that there was a serious violation of ethics in the case of posting a message referring to the institution. By revoking the right to apply for election forever and having no right to hold political positions, that even though such a decision has been issued It is considered that there is nothing different from now. It’s just that I thought that I would wait another 6 years. After the first sentence of disqualification was over, I would return to be an MP and continue to hold political positions. You probably won’t have to wait. But he confirmed that his role had been in the past since the Future Forward Party era. How has it been so far? It will still be like that in every way. And now that the election for Subdistrict Administrative Organization members across the country is approaching, they will help prepare for the event. Working in the area Make campaign policies at all three levels. and in the election of MPs In the future, if the Forward Party continues to use them. Will continue to be a campaign assistant for the party Including criticism, analysis, and giving any political opinions will still be done through various YouTube and Tiktok channels. So, what have you seen yourself doing? It’s still the same. Nothing has changed. As for the matter of not being able to run for parliament in the election, it doesn’t have any meaning. Because he came to work in politics not only hoping to become an MP and a minister. But I want to push forward and create change for the country. and can continue to do so outside of parliament

For things that are carried out will take turns pushing through. Are the MPs of the progressive party as well or not? Ms. Pannika said that the truth is that she wants to push it through all party MPs because it’s not just them. Forward party MPs who are trying to create change, if they have friends from other party MPs helping them do it, they will succeed more quickly. Because they think that these matters are matters of principle and position, which of course the Progressive Party has the same standpoint as their own. Because coming from the same place is the same new future. But on many matters, other political parties agree. such as equal marriage abolition of military conscription Including the matter of amending the constitution All parties agree. Therefore, the drive to push outside parliament is probably not specific to any one party. But as the Moving Forward Party helped the Moving Forward Party campaign. I feel that the Progressive Party is the party that holds the most hope. But this does not mean that there is only one party that can make the dream of transforming our country come true.

Pannika said that she did not know how to spell the word discouraged and not discouraged and saw that in the case of Miss Pareena Kraikupt and Mr. Sira Jenjaka being deprived of their political rights. It’s not any different from him. which saw that no matter what politician who were deprived of their rights due to ethical standards Can a politician’s political future really be cut to that extent? which saw that if politicians would not have a future There should be none from the fact that he has no one to choose from. That is, the people should decide the future of politicians. It is not an ethical standard. which can be interpreted in many ways Therefore, I think that this is more important and something that we must continue to drive forward. You cannot be discouraged. And it will turn out that this is one of adding more work than having to clearly state this matter to society that it is not a matter of any one person. But I admit that coming to speak when it happened to me must be careful Because he is not good at making demands for himself. But he is more adept at advocating for principles for others. When it is about yourself, you are afraid that it will be seen as a matter of benefit whether you are affected or not. This is true no matter who it happens to. It is not correct according to the principles either.

For the case where Ms. Pareena posted that she did not agree. Ms. Pannika said that in truth, she and Ms. Pareena had never had any personal issues. But it is a political role, when Ms. Pareena was disqualified. He was one of the people who came out to speak out and disagree. and saw that it was against the principles As for the occasion when political parties propose to amend the constitution and have the House of Representatives come to draft a new draft. Whether there will be a correction in the matter of moral culpability or not. Ms. Pannika said that recently the Kao Klai Party issued a statement clearly mentioning this matter in the preparation of the entire new constitution. This is expected to happen soon because it is a policy that the Pheu Thai Party has been campaigning for as well. Therefore, it is seen that it is necessary to reform the court organization. and independent organizations This matter will be resolved forever. It’s not like we’re calling each other because one person is affected. And it is considered good that the Progressive Party has talked about and is aware of the issue of amending the constitution regarding the courts and independent organizations. – Thai News Agency

Source: Thai News Agency